requireCurlyBraces: support the with statement

Just a test case for with that came to mind, no real importance. Should I
change it?

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Oleg Gaidarenko <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> In test/rules/require-curly-braces.js:
>
> >          assert(!checker.checkString('try {x++;} catch(e) throw e;').isEmpty());
> >          assert(!checker.checkString('switch(\'4\'){ case \'4\': break; }').isEmpty());
> >          assert(!checker.checkString('switch(\'4\'){ case \'4\': {break;} default: 1; }').isEmpty());
> > +        assert(!checker.checkString('with(x) console.log(toString());').isEmpty());
>
> console.log?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/jscs-dev/node-jscs/pull/661/files#r18436763>.
>