Because alot of the time they aren't well formed tables and it causes alot of complexity in managing parsing that for only what im assuming is a small set of scenarios.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Gustavo Guerra" <notifications@github.com>
Sent: ‎04/‎04/‎2014 18:25
To: "fsharp/FSharp.Data" <FSharp.Data@noreply.github.com>
Cc: "Colin" <colinbul@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [FSharp.Data] Html type provider (#559)

In src/Html/HtmlProvider.fs:
> @@ -65,6 +69,7 @@ type public HtmlProvider(cfg:TypeProviderConfig) as this =
>          """<summary>Typed representation of an HTML file</summary>
>             <param name='Sample'>Location of an HTML sample file or a string containing a sample HTML document</param>
>             <param name='PreferOptionals'>When set to true, inference will prefer to use the option type instead of nullable types, double.NaN or "" for missing values. Defaults to false</param>
> +           <param name='IncludeLayoutTables'>Includes tables that are potentially layout tables (with cellpadding=0 and cellspacing=0 attributes)</param>
Why don't we just always include them instead of adding an option?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.