No, fixed.


On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:49 AM, G.A. vd. Hoorn <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> In industrial_trajectory_filters/src/smoothing_trajectory_filter.cpp:
>
> > +	  fprintf(fp,"%lf ", rob_trajectory.getWayPoint(i).getVariablePosition(j)); // j'th state of i'th waypoint
> > +	}
> > +	fprintf(fp, ";\n");
> > +      }
> > +      fprintf(fp, "];\n");
> > +      fclose(fp);
> > +    }// end of print function
> > +  } // end of un named namespace
> > +
> > +
> > +  SmoothingTrajectoryFilter::SmoothingTrajectoryFilter()
> > +  {
> > +      initialized_ = false;
> > +  }
> > +
> > +  bool SmoothingTrajectoryFilter::Init(std::vector<double> coef)
>
> Is this pass-by-value on purpose?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/ros-industrial/industrial_core/pull/77/files#r13218376>
> .
>