Fixed timer cast-to-int crash causing incorrect benchmark.

The perf benchmark uses a 1 millisecond timer to interfere with the serializing process. However, the original benchmark used ```cast(Integer.class)``` which just simply throws an error on a long value thus terminating the whole serialization process almost immediately. What gets measured is how fast can the whole process restarted to fail again.

With the fix, I get the following numbers:
```
Benchmark                                        (size)         Score  Score error
r.o.OSP.noSerializationSingleThreaded                 1  15632242,955   576291,356
r.o.OSP.noSerializationSingleThreaded              1000    143971,769     1129,048
r.o.OSP.noSerializationSingleThreaded           1000000       153,444        8,286
r.o.OSP.serializedSingleStream                        1   7249531,621   140827,908
r.o.OSP.serializedSingleStream                     1000     52595,958     1845,084
r.o.OSP.serializedSingleStream                  1000000        53,001        1,155
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended           1    143335,868     3643,346
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended        1000      3453,108       22,826
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended     1000000         3,113        0,127
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsOneFastOneSlow            1     99417,300     5162,370
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsOneFastOneSlow         1000     14857,037     7131,489
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsSlightlyContended         1     82621,317     1977,208
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsSlightlyContended      1000         1,007        0,026
```

Clearly, the serializedTwoStreamsSlightlyContended() shows that under a second, you can serialize two 1 millisecond sources.

For comparison with my latest endeavors, the custom WriterReaderPhaser + AtomicResizableArray + Fast-path queue drain with front check produces the following values:
(Mode: thrpt, Samples: 5)
```
r.o.OSP.serializedSingleStream                        1   4702012,445    65485,925    64.86%
r.o.OSP.serializedSingleStream                     1000     43189,631     1508,771    82.12%
r.o.OSP.serializedSingleStream                  1000000        42,384        1,531    79.97%
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended           1    138302,278     3530,496    96.45%
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended        1000      3085,205      118,029    89.34%
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended     1000000         3,284        0,555   105.49%
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsOneFastOneSlow            1    100760,210     6614,699   101.35%
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsOneFastOneSlow         1000      1464,140     1015,858     9.85%
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsSlightlyContended         1     82823,995      835,143   102.44%
r.o.OSP.serializedTwoStreamsSlightlyContended      1000         1,002        0,014
```

A specialized two-way only striped custom WriterReaderPhaser produces these:
```
r.o.OSP2.serializedSingleStream                        1  4551488,444   776149,420
r.o.OSP2.serializedSingleStream                     1000    14567,954      246,157
r.o.OSP2.serializedSingleStream                  1000000       14,358        0,574
r.o.OSP2.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended           1   165429,534     1245,682
r.o.OSP2.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended        1000     3383,878       62,534
r.o.OSP2.serializedTwoStreamsHighlyContended     1000000        3,459        0,759
r.o.OSP2.serializedTwoStreamsOneFastOneSlow            1   105104,317     1247,636
r.o.OSP2.serializedTwoStreamsOneFastOneSlow         1000      265,691       90,654
r.o.OSP2.serializedTwoStreamsSlightlyContended         1    82814,850     1824,645
r.o.OSP2.serializedTwoStreamsSlightlyContended      1000        1,002        0,014
```

I'm not quite sure why ```serializedTwoStreamsOneFastOneSlow``` is so low in my versions. My guess is that since they are lock-free, the timer's thread ends up shoveling the events more frequently than in the synchronized case (because it can sleep).