I would revert the compat changes, since I think they will more naturally go into the XML module. Or you could commit them, and we can reverse individually later on.

L


On 12 May 2014, at 19:42, Stefan Kögl <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In soco/compat.py:
> 
> > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> > +
> > +""" Module that contains various compatability definitions and imports """
> Agreed, but the XML module should be handled in a separate PR in my opinion. Is it OK if I leave the compat module as it is now, or would you suggest to revert it?
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
>