drivers: usb: fix false disconnect

due to a signal sent to the reading process

- In the current implementation, when a signal is sent to the reading process,
  read is cancelled by calling usb_ep_dequeue, which lead into calling
  acc_complete_out with ECONNRESET, but the current logic treats it as
  disconnection, which makes the device inaccessible until cable is actually
  disconnected.
- The fix calls disconnect only when ESHUTDOWN error is passed.
- If data has already arrived while trying cancelling, the data is marked
  as available, and it will be read out on the next read. This is necessary
  as USB bulk is assumed to guarantee no data loss.

Signed-off-by: keunyoung <keunyoung@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Revert "cpufreq: ondemand: Remove unused waitqueue"

This reverts commit 744af7e9050cf6e2d6cd95be5e0550c0bc07fdab.
Revert "cpufreq: ondemand: Use hotplug thread infrastructure"

This reverts commit 58288f787b6fb824c4094efb01fe81764af65d0c.
readahead: make context readahead more conservative

This helps performance on moderately dense random reads on SSD.

Transaction-Per-Second numbers provided by Taobao:

		QPS	case
		-------------------------------------------------------
		7536	disable context readahead totally
w/ patch:	7129	slower size rampup and start RA on the 3rd read
		6717	slower size rampup
w/o patch:	5581	unmodified context readahead

Before, readahead will be started whenever reading page N+1 when it happen
to read N recently.  After patch, we'll only start readahead when *three*
random reads happen to access pages N, N+1, N+2.  The probability of this
happening is extremely low for pure random reads, unless they are very
dense, which actually deserves some readahead.

Also start with a smaller readahead window.  The impact to interleaved
sequential reads should be small, because for a long run stream, the the
small readahead window rampup phase is negletable.

The context readahead actually benefits clustered random reads on HDD
whose seek cost is pretty high.  However as SSD is increasingly used for
random read workloads it's better for the context readahead to concentrate
on interleaved sequential reads.

Another SSD rand read test from Miao

        # file size:        2GB
        # read IO amount: 625MB
        sysbench --test=fileio          \
                --max-requests=10000    \
                --num-threads=1         \
                --file-num=1            \
                --file-block-size=64K   \
                --file-test-mode=rndrd  \
                --file-fsync-freq=0     \
                --file-fsync-end=off    run

shows the performance of btrfs grows up from 69MB/s to 121MB/s, ext4 from
104MB/s to 121MB/s.

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
Tested-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
Linux 3.4.80

Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>