> Hum, I'm wondering which ambiguities you came across. When I run MapMappingTest in the original form with your changes in the matching code, the test still passes. From a quick view I also can't find any suspicuous methods, so I'm tempted to leave the map mapping test as is. WDYT?

Right, _after_ incorporating the generics PR, the test does not fail anymore. They will fail again (and need the same refactoring) as soon as we implement using mapping methods with ```@MappingTarget``` parameters for property mappings as well. My code initially picked those methods up, but the current version of the MethodMatcher eliminates them.

I'm fine with both: leaving it as it is, or reverting to the original state (for now).