He call it commentary, and he uses only consumer-grade equipment (CD
player, recorder, headset microphone) if you are referring to the
technology he used. And I assume yes, his recordings may contain "I like
this story" type commentary too. He imports audio to ELAN for comparison
and annotation.


On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 3:34 PM, cesine <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In docs/CAML/caml2012.tex:
>
> > @@ -455,7 +457,7 @@ \subsubsection{Data entry and import}
> >  Data entry is expected to be grouped by elicitation session (or by publication or other data sources).
> >  In fact,
> >  one expected method of data entry is not data entry at all,
> > -but rather the video recording of an elicitation session followed by transcribing the session at a later date.
> > +but rather the video recording of an elicitation session followed by transcribing the session at a later date.\footnote{For example, Cox's two-stage Basic Oral Annotation method \citep{Cox:2013} utilizes commentary orally provided by language consultants for more careful, targeted annotation at a later time. }
> >  Longer audio/video files can also optionally be uploaded to the speech web service (see \S \ref{sec:phoneticwebservice}) which uses Praat to automatically split the audio stream into utterances.
>
> does he call it a comentary? commentary might include stuff like "i like
> this story", or "i think the original story teller had it wrong here..."
>
> i thought what he was describing was "voice writing"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voice_writer
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/OpenSourceFieldlinguistics/FieldDB/pull/1380/files#r9774259>
> .
>