Input: Send events one packet at a time

On heavy event loads, such as a multitouch driver, the irqsoff latency
can be as high as 250 us.  By accumulating a frame worth of data
before passing it on, the latency can be dramatically reduced.  As a
side effect, the special EV_SYN handling can be removed, since the
frame is now atomic.

This patch adds the events() handler callback and uses it if it
exists. The latency is improved by 50 us even without the callback.

Change-Id: Iebd9b1868ae6300a922a45b6d104e7c2b38e4cf5
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@enac.fr>
Tested-by: Ping Cheng <pingc@wacom.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>

Input: Improve the events-per-packet estimate

The events-per-packet estimate has so far been used by MT devices
only. This patch adjusts the packet buffer size to also accomodate the
KEY and MSC events.  Keyboards normally send one or two keys at a
time. MT devices normally send a number of button keys along with the
MT information.  The buffer size chosen here covers those cases, and
matches the default buffer size in evdev. Since the input estimate is
now preferred, remove the special input-mt estimate.

Reviewed-and-tested-by: Ping Cheng <pingc@wacom.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@enac.fr>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Franco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
cpufreq: ondemand: Fix update_sampling_rate race with hotplug

update_sampling_rate has a for loop which goes through each
online cpu and possibly queue up the ondemand work for them.
But while doing this it doesnt take any hotplug lock which
could potentially cause a race condition where ondemand work
is queued after the hotplug code (which sets the policy to NULL)
in the governor has cancelled any pending work. This could cause
a crash while trying to access the NULL policy in dbs_check_cpu.

Protecting the for_each_online_cpu loop with get_online_cpus()
and put_online_cpus().

Change-Id: Ia3f43ca7e4bed542834ab03ca1191d728f13311c
Signed-off-by: Rohit Gupta <rohgup@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: ondemand: Fix hotplug deadlock with store_powersave_bias

store_powersave_bias() acquires the hotplug lock and the dbs_mutex
lock, but does so in the wrong order.  Deadlocks like the following
can result.

Thread A:
    get_online_cpus+0x3c/0x5c           <- acquires 'cpu_hotplug.lock'
    store_powersave_bias+0x80/0x3f4     <- acquires 'dbs_mutex'
    kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x20
    sysfs_write_file+0x108/0x13c
    vfs_write+0xb0/0x128
    sys_write+0x38/0x64

Thread B:
    cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x7c/0x55c     <- acquires 'dbs_mutex'
    __cpufreq_governor+0x90/0xe0
    __cpufreq_set_policy+0x1b0/0x258
    cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0x2cc/0x334
    cpufreq_add_dev+0x514/0x580
    cpufreq_cpu_callback+0x88/0x9c
    notifier_call_chain+0x38/0x68
    __cpu_notify+0x28/0x40
    _cpu_up+0xe4/0x118                  <- acquires 'cpu_hotplug.lock'
    cpu_up+0x64/0x80
    store_online+0x48/0x78
    dev_attr_store+0x18/0x24
    sysfs_write_file+0x108/0x13c
    vfs_write+0xb0/0x128
    sys_write+0x38/0x64

Fix this by flipping the order in which the locks are acquired and
released in store_powersave_bias so that it is the same as in the
hotplug path.

Change-Id: Idc59fb29d60b8f7fceb8ed0f2bb9eff4670abda7
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: Save user policy min/max instead of policy min/max during hotplug

When a CPU is hotplugged off, various fields of the policy are saved so
that they can be restored when the CPU is hotplugged back in.

The existing code saves the policy min/max field during hotplug remove and
restores it into user policy min/max during hotplug add. This results in
the loss of the user policy min/max values across a hotplug remove/add.

Fix it by saving the user policy min/max instead of policy min/max during
hotplug remove. During a hotplug add, after user policy min/max is
restored, the policy min/max is already recomputed. So, there's no risk of
going beyound any limits imposed by the CPUFREQ_ADJUST/INCOMPATIBLE
notifiers.

Change-Id: Ib8e09fa324c1f80f095c5754b5dcf2685e8e4a66
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>