Ah, perhaps it should say "Copyright 2013, 2014" then? According to that StackOverflow thread anytime a work is substantially advised you should add to the copyright date instead of changing it. That way you retain the originally copyright *and* initiate a new one. =)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 19, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Zachary Crockett <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> In inc/spark_wiring_network.h:
> 
> >   * @brief   Header for spark_wiring_network.cpp module
> >   ******************************************************************************
> > -  Copyright (c) 2013 Spark Labs, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> > +  Copyright (c) 2014 Spark Labs, Inc.  All rights reserved.
> When I merge, I'll definitely revert this line—our copyright year for this file must always remain 2013. See the following stackoverflow thread for why: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2390230/do-copyright-dates-need-to-be-updated
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.