msm: cpufreq: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer

In the function cpufreq_governor_dbs,( case CPUFREQ_GOV_START )
sysfs creation is under the critical section where as
(case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP) sysfs removal is not under critical section.
If a START/STOP done frequently from user space then there is chance
of hitting the race condition with sysfs interface creation and removal.
Hence the removal of sysfs entry should happen in the criticalpath.

Change-Id: I3b0dd475e8e306b633b282ff23bd1c8195b5f45f
CRs-fixed: 564850
Signed-off-by: Swetha Chikkaboraiah <schikk@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: ondemand:kernel NULL pointer dereference at dbs_check_cpu

Function dbs_check_cpu  calls __cpufreq_driver_getavg
With  policy as IN/OUT parameter.
There is possiblity of policy becoming NULL in
 __cpufreq_driver_getavg. Same policy is getting
accessed in the for loop which leads to NULL pointer dereference.
So NULL check is required for the policy

CRs-fixed: 582925
Change-Id: Ib8d8de8d66500430a5aa4c275937640e4f934aa8
Signed-off-by: Swetha Chikkaboraiah <schikk@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: interactive: restructure CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS

The cpufreq_interactive_timer gets cancelled and rescheduled
whenever the cpufreq_policy is changed. When the cpufreq policy is
changed at a rate faster than the sampling_rate of the interactive
governor, then the governor misses to change the target frequency
for long duration. The patch removes the need of cancelling the
timers when policy->min is changed.

Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan <Badhri@google.com>
Change-Id: I7862f1c8022a3b98a890e7537f93d02010e86764
cpufreq: interactive: turn boost_pulse off on boost off

Change-Id: I36fe217fa047d68ea90e78b12c7db4537ea8010b
Signed-off-by: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>
cpufreq: interactive: fix compiling warnings

The gcc warns like:

  cpufreq_interactive.c:745:6: warning: operation on 'ret' may be
undefined [-Wsequence-point]

It was introduced by commit cf0fad49d17cb8273ce555dd5b7afab67d7923bf.

Since sprintf(...) just return 1 (one character) in this case, ret
should not changed.
Just discarding the result of sprintf(...) leads to the result that
the committer of cf0fad49d17cb8273ce555dd5b7afab67d7923bf wants.

Change-Id: Ifed1cef6d6a31c3ed23dad03a567b3b9eddf3a57
Signed-off-by: Chih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@android-x86.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Daynard <nardholio@gmail.com>