changed accentuations of ὀσφύς lemma

Danker has ύ which is clearly the accentuation used in the SBLGNT text.

BDAG (and Mounce) have ῦ following Herodian but given our text, I don’t
think we have a choice.
should be nominative
fixed number error in διέβλεψεν
changed to genitive plural per inflection
changed handling of Ἐλαιῶν in Lk 19.29/21.37

Given the accentuation in the text, an analysis consistent with other
occurrences makes the most sense (and see BDF)
just use στοιχεῖον for the lemma
fix Νύμφα lemma in Col 4.15
corrected accentuation of πραϋπαθία lemma

Now follows Danker CL, BDAG and the text itself.
Change accentuation of Χεροῦβ

It is not clear why Danker changed to Χεροῦβ from the Χερούβ of BDAG.
I don’t see any particular reason to choose one over the other based on
the text so, giving priority to Danker CL, changing this.
corrected accentuation of lemma

fixes #14
changed ῥέδη lemma

following Danker, BDAG, Mounce, etc
(the accentuation of text doesn’t help distinguish)