ARM: 7461/1: topology: Add arch_scale_freq_power function

Add infrastructure to be able to modify the cpu_power of each core

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
ARM: 7462/1: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks

This factorization has also been proposed in another patch that has not been
merged yet:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/080873.html
So, this patch could be dropped depending of the state of the other one.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
ARM: 7463/1: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT information

Use cpu compatibility field and clock-frequency field of DT to
estimate the capacity of each core of the system and to update
the cpu_power field accordingly.
This patch enables to put more running tasks on big cores than
on LITTLE ones. But this patch doesn't ensure that long running
tasks will run on big cores and short ones on LITTLE cores.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
ARM: 7482/1: topology: fix section mismatch warning for init_cpu_topology

Get rid of this warning..
arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xac78): Section mismatch in reference
from the function init_cpu_topology() to the function
 .init.text:parse_dt_topology()
The function init_cpu_topology() references
the function __init parse_dt_topology().
This is often because init_cpu_topology lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of parse_dt_topology is wrong.

Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
ARM: kernel: enhance MPIDR macro definitions

Kernel subsystems other than the topology layer need the MPIDR
mask definitions to access the MPIDR without relying on hardcoded
masks. This patch moves the MPIDR register masks definition to
a header file and defines a macro to simplify access to MPIDR bit fields
representing affinity levels.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
ARM: kernel: update topology to use new MPIDR macros

This patch updates the topology initialization code to use the newly
defined accessors to retrieve the MPIDR affinity levels.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
arm: remove cast for kzalloc return value

remove cast for kzalloc return value.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity

Currently the topology code computes cpu capacity and stores it in
the list along with hwid(which is MPIDR) as it parses the CPU nodes
in the device tree. This is required as it needs to be mapped to the
logical CPU later.

Since the CPU device nodes can be retrieved in the logical ordering
using DT/OF helpers, its possible to store cpu_capacity also in logical
ordering and avoid storing hwid for each entry.

This patch removes hwid by making use of of_get_cpu_node.

Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
ARM: 7920/1: topology: Staticise non-exported symbols

These symbols are only referenced in this source file so can be made
static, and the efficiency table is constant data so can be declared as
such.  This avoids polluting the global namespace and fixes warnings
from sparse.

The function arch_scale_freq_power() is still not prototyped or static,
this is a separate issue as this is overriding a weak symbol from the
scheduler which neglects to provide a prototype.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
ARM: 8008/1: topology: Coding style fixes

Use kcalloc() and ULONG_MAX rather than open coding them.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library

This patch moves the generalized implementation of of_get_cpu_node from
PowerPC to DT core library, thereby adding support for retrieving cpu
node for a given logical cpu index on any architecture.

The CPU subsystem can now use this function to assign of_node in the
cpu device while registering CPUs.

It is recommended to use these helper function only in pre-SMP/early
initialisation stages to retrieve CPU device node pointers in logical
ordering. Once the cpu devices are registered, it can be retrieved easily
from cpu device of_node which avoids unnecessary parsing and matching.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>

Conflicts:
	arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
sched: cpu_power: enable ARCH_POWER

Heteregeneous ARM platform uses arch_scale_freq_power function
to reflect the relative capacity of each core

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1341826026-6504-6-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
ARM: topology: Add efficiency coefficient for Krait

* Instead using default value of CPU efficiency,
  use same as that of cortex-a15.

Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>