Change the way type variables are printed in diagnostics

This PR aims to improve the readability of diagnostic messages that involve unresolved type variables. Currently, messages like the following:

```rust
mismatched types: expected `core::result::Result<uint,()>`, found `core::option::Option<<generic #1>>`
<anon>:6     let a: Result<uint, ()> = None;
                                       ^~~~
mismatched types: expected `&mut <generic #2>`, found `uint`
<anon>:7     f(42u);
               ^~~
```

tend to appear unapproachable to new users. [0] While specific type var IDs are valuable in
diagnostics that deal with more than one such variable, in practice many messages
only mention one. In those cases, leaving out the specific number makes the messages
slightly less terrifying.

```rust
mismatched types: expected `core::result::Result<uint, ()>`, found `core::option::Option<_>`
<anon>:6     let a: Result<uint, ()> = None;
                                       ^~~~
mismatched types: expected `&mut _`, found `uint`
<anon>:7     f(42u);
               ^~~
```

As you can see, I also tweaked the aesthetics slightly by changing type variables to use the type hole syntax _. For integer variables, the syntax used is:

```rust
mismatched types: expected `core::result::Result<uint, ()>`, found `core::option::Option<_#1i>`
<anon>:6     let a: Result<uint, ()> = Some(1);
```

and float variables:

```rust
mismatched types: expected `core::result::Result<uint, ()>`, found `core::option::Option<_#1f>`
<anon>:6     let a: Result<uint, ()> = Some(0.5);
```

[0] https://twitter.com/coda/status/517713085465772032
Could you sneak in a fix for the issue where `(int,)` is formatted like `(int)`? I was just about to make a fix for this myself but I saw that this PR changes quite a bit of that code anyway.