I agree – when I read the metadata.py I thought this was a mistake.
I do not think we need this unit.

Maybe we can compare the unit names to the new table Ismail put together in the wizard rfc for impact functions

From: Tim Sutton [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Friday, 2 May 2014 6:41 PM
To: AIFDR/inasafe
Cc: Morgan Charlotte
Subject: Re: [inasafe] Fix 953 (#963)


In safe/metadata.py:

> @@ -167,11 +169,12 @@

>  }

>  unit_mmi_depth = {

>      'id': 'mmi_depth',

> -    'name': tr('MMI'),

> +    'name': tr('MMI Depth'),

Personally I am confused by what we mean by MMI depth here. I though MMI was human perception of shaking (:. measured at surface).....

@Charlotte-Morgan<https://github.com/Charlotte-Morgan> / @vanpuk<https://github.com/vanpuk> can you shed any light on if it make sense to even have this?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/AIFDR/inasafe/pull/963/files#r12222696>.

Geoscience Australia Disclaimer: This e-mail (and files transmitted with it) is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, then you have received this e-mail by mistake and any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and its file attachments is prohibited. The security of emails transmitted cannot be guaranteed; by forwarding or replying to this email, you acknowledge and accept these risks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------