let-aliasing + removing let imps

First draft of proposal to remove implications from the let typing judgment (replaced by a logically equivalent or) and add aliasing for let-bindings where the expression being bound has an object (e.g. x, (car y), etc...).

This speeds up type checking (e.g. the 'filters-more' function from http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view&pr=14838) and adds the ability to typecheck expressions that utilize simple let bindings of pure expressions, such as the following function:

#lang typed/racket

(: foo (Any -> Number))
(define (foo x)
  (match x
    [(? number?) x]))


The current implementation has 2 errors when running the unit tests at the moment, which relate to usages of types with '...' such as:

(let: ((f : (All (b ...) (Any ... b -> Any)) (lambda x (quote x)))) (lambda xs (apply f (quote y) xs)))

Obviously I need to work out these errors before this is pulled, but this is what it looks like at the moment, FYI.

When referring to this PR in areas where references to previous PRs exist, do we need a prefix to say this is a PR for the TR repository? e.g. this would be PR TR-2 instead of PR 2?