[Support] Promote cl::StringSaver to a separate utility

This class is generally useful.

In breaking it out, the primary change is that it has been made
non-virtual. It seems like being abstract led to there being 3 different
(2 in llvm + 1 in clang) concrete implementations which disagreed about
the ownership of the saved strings (see the manual call to free() in the
unittest StrDupSaver; yes this is different from the CommandLine.cpp
StrDupSaver which owns the stored strings; which is different from
Clang's StringSetSaver which just holds a reference to a
std::set<std::string> which owns the strings).

I've identified 2 other places in the
codebase that are open-coding this pattern:

  memcpy(Alloc.Allocate<char>(strlen(S)+1), S, strlen(S)+1)

I'll be switching them over. They are
* llvm::sys::Process::GetArgumentVector
* The StringAllocator member of YAMLIO's Input class
This also will allow simplifying Clang's driver.cpp quite a bit.

Let me know if there are any other places that could benefit from
StringSaver. I'm also thinking of adding a saveStringRef member for
getting a stable StringRef.
Update for LLVM change (StringSaver)

There is more cleanup to be done here. Once
llvm::sys::Process::GetArgumentVector is switched over to StringSaver,
we can simplify this code a fair amount.