DeadlockDetectionTest: Cleanup threads after testrun

With the previous test code the threads will stay in deadlock forever until the JVM is killed. The new code uses Locks that can be interrupted instead, so that thread cleanup is possible after the test run.

Due to the different locking semantics the exception output is now:

~~~
com.jayway.awaitility.core.ConditionTimeoutException: com.jayway.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.untilAtomic Callable expected (<true> or <true>) but was <false> within 200 milliseconds.
	at com.jayway.awaitility.core.ConditionAwaiter.await(ConditionAwaiter.java:96)
	at com.jayway.awaitility.core.AbstractHamcrestCondition.await(AbstractHamcrestCondition.java:136)
	at com.jayway.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.until(ConditionFactory.java:590)
	at com.jayway.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.untilAtomic(ConditionFactory.java:505)
	at com.jayway.awaitility.core.ConditionFactory.untilTrue(ConditionFactory.java:519)
	at com.jayway.awaitility.DeadlockDetectionTest.deadlockTest(DeadlockDetectionTest.java:67)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.FailOnTimeout$StatementThread.run(FailOnTimeout.java:62)
Caused by: com.jayway.awaitility.core.DeadlockException: Deadlocked threads detected:

"Thread-2" Id=11 WAITING on java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@35369763 owned by "Thread-1" Id=10
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	-  waiting on java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@35369763
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:894)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1221)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.lockInterruptibly(ReentrantLock.java:340)
	at com.jayway.awaitility.DeadlockDetectionTest$2.run(DeadlockDetectionTest.java:51)

	Number of locked synchronizers = 1
	- java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@4e19e97b

"Thread-1" Id=10 WAITING on java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@4e19e97b owned by "Thread-2" Id=11
	at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	-  waiting on java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@4e19e97b
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:894)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1221)
	at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.lockInterruptibly(ReentrantLock.java:340)
	at com.jayway.awaitility.DeadlockDetectionTest$1.run(DeadlockDetectionTest.java:33)

	Number of locked synchronizers = 1
	- java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@35369763


	at com.jayway.awaitility.core.ConditionAwaiter.await(ConditionAwaiter.java:101)
	... 14 more
~~~