MIT license update

According to what I understand from the MIT license, the name of the
original author in the copyright seems to be the only obligation to
respect it correctly.

I’m also possibly waiting for a response here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26033524/licensing-under-mit-a-librar
y-ive-rewritten-and-renamed-thats-already-under

poke @necolas: Is this ok for you this way ?