acpuclock-8064 : Correcting freq step for normal and OC

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Najmi Ahmad Zabidi <najmi.zabidi@gmail.com>
block: fiops ioscheduler core

FIOPS (Fair IOPS) ioscheduler is IOPS based ioscheduler, so only targets
for drive without I/O seek. It's quite similar like CFQ, but the dispatch
decision is made according to IOPS instead of slice.

The algorithm is simple. Drive has a service tree, and each task lives in
the tree. The key into the tree is called vios (virtual I/O). Every request
has vios, which is calculated according to its ioprio, request size and so
on. Task's vios is the sum of vios of all requests it dispatches. FIOPS
always selects task with minimum vios in the service tree and let the task
dispatch request. The dispatched request's vios is then added to the task's
vios and the task is repositioned in the sevice tree.

Unlike CFQ, FIOPS doesn't have separate sync/async queues, because with I/O
less writeback, usually a task can only dispatch either sync or async requests.
Bias read or write request can still be done with read/write scale.

One issue is if workload iodepth is lower than drive queue_depth, IOPS
share of a task might not be strictly according to its priority, request
size and so on. In this case, the drive is in idle actually. Solving the
problem need make drive idle, so impact performance. I believe CFQ isn't
completely fair between tasks in such case too.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>

Conflicts:

	block/Kconfig.iosched
	block/Makefile
bfq-iosched: Tuning for SSD
bfq-iosched: Set bfq_back_penalty = 1
xsched: Optimize build_sched_domains() for saving first SD node for a cpu

Backport:

We are saving first scheduling domain for a cpu in build_sched_domains() by
iterating over the nested sd->child list. We don't actually need to do it this
way.

tl will be equal to sched_domain_topology for the first iteration and so we can
set *per_cpu_ptr(d.sd, i) based on that.  So, save pointer to first SD while
running the iteration loop over tl's.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/fc473527cbc4dfa0b8eeef2a59db74684eb59a83.1370436120.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Cruz <ljc2491@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: poondog <markj338@gmail.com>
cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_verify()

cpufreq_frequency_table_verify() is rewritten here to make it more logical
and efficient.
 - merge multiple lines for variable declarations together.
 - quit early if any frequency between min/max is found.
 - don't call cpufreq_verify_within_limits() in case any valid freq is
   found as it is of no use.
 - rename the count variable as found and change its type to boolean.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
ext4: remove useless marking of superblock dirty

Commit a0375156 properly notes that superblock doesn't need to be marked
as dirty when only number of free inodes / blocks / number of directories
changes since that is recomputed on each mount anyway. However that comment
leaves some unnecessary markings as dirty in place. Remove these.

Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
ext4: convert last user of ext4_mark_super_dirty() to ext4_handle_dirty_super()

The last user of ext4_mark_super_dirty() in ext4_file_open() is so
rare it can well be modifying the superblock properly by journalling
the change.  Change it and get rid of ext4_mark_super_dirty() as it's
not needed anymore.

Artem: small amendments.
Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
ext4: remove unnecessary superblock dirtying

This patch changes the 'ext4_handle_dirty_super()' function which
submits the superblock for I/O in the following cases:

1. When creating the first large file on a file system without
   EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE feature.
2. When re-sizing the file-system.
3. When creating an xattr on a file-system without the
   EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR feature.

If the file-system has journal enabled, the superblock is written via
the journal. We do not modify this path.

If the file-system has no journal, this function, falls back to just
marking the superblock as dirty using the 's_dirt' superblock
flag. This means that it delays the actual superblock I/O submission
by 5 seconds (default setting).  Namely, the 'sync_supers()' kernel
thread will call 'ext4_write_super()' later and will actually submit
the superblock for I/O.

And this is the behavior this patch modifies: we stop using 's_dirt'
and just mark the superblock buffer as dirty right away. Indeed, all 3
cases above are extremely rare and it does not add any value to delay
the I/O submission for them.

Note: 'ext4_handle_dirty_super()' executes
'__ext4_handle_dirty_super()' with 'now = 0'. This patch basically
makes the 'now' argument unneeded and it will be deleted in one of the
next patches.

This patch also removes 's_dirt' condition on the unmount path because
we never set it anymore, so we should not test it.

Tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
ext4: weed out ext4_write_super

We do not depend on VFS's '->write_super()' anymore and do not need
the 's_dirt' flag anymore, so weed out 'ext4_write_super()' and
's_dirt'.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Linux 3.4.83
acpuclock 8064 : Repair LOWCLOCKS

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Najmi Ahmad Zabidi <najmi.zabidi@gmail.com>
Aufa v22

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Najmi Ahmad Zabidi <najmi.zabidi@gmail.com>
acpuclock 8064 - file update

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Najmi Ahmad Zabidi <najmi.zabidi@gmail.com>
acpuclock 8064 - put krait line before .stby

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Najmi Ahmad Zabidi <najmi.zabidi@gmail.com>