I'll rename it. I agree that name is better.


On 2 April 2014 18:48:12 David Reid <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> > +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
> > +# You may obtain a copy of the License at
> > +#
> > +#    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > +#
> > +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
> > +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
> > +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
> > +# implied.
> > +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
> > +# limitations under the License.
> > +
> > +from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function
> > +
> > +
> > +class OpenSSLPrivateKey(object):
>
> I think we should give this a less confusing name 
> `TraditionalOpenSSLFormatPrivateKey` maybe.
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/627/files#r11217737