btrfs: allocate raid type kobjects dynamically

We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when we
allocate space_info. When a user does something like:

# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt -f
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /

We can end up with memory corruption since the kobject hasn't
been reinitialized properly and the name pointer was left set.

The rationale behind allocating them statically was to avoid
creating a separate kobject container that just contained the
raid type. It used the index in the array to determine the index.

Ultimately, though, this wastes more memory than it saves in all
but the most complex scenarios and introduces kobject lifetime
questions.

This patch allocates the kobjects dynamically instead. Note that
we also remove the kobject_get/put of the parent kobject since
kobject_add and kobject_del do that internally.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
fs: btrfs: volumes.c: Fix for possible null pointer dereference

There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.

Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.

Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: ensure readers see new data after a clone operation

We were cleaning the clone target file range from the page cache before
we did replace the file extent items in the fs tree. This was racy,
as right after cleaning the relevant range from the page cache and before
replacing the file extent items, a read against that range could be
performed by another task and populate again the page cache with stale
data (stale after the cloning finishes). This would result in reads after
the clone operation successfully finishes to get old data (and potentially
for a very long time). Therefore evict the pages after replacing the file
extent items, so that subsequent reads will always get the new data.

Similarly, we were prone to races while cloning the file extent items
because we weren't locking the target range and wait for any existing
ordered extents against that range to complete. It was possible that
after cloning the extent items, a write operation that was performed
before the clone operation and overlaps the same range, would end up
undoing all or part of the work the clone operation did (a worker task
running inode.c:btrfs_finish_ordered_io). Therefore lock the target
range in the io tree, wait for all pending ordered extents against that
range to finish and then safely perform the cloning.

The issue of reading stale data after the clone operation is easy to
reproduce by running the following C program in a loop until it exits
with return value 1.

 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <pthread.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
 #include <assert.h>
 #include <asm/types.h>
 #include <linux/ioctl.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/ioctl.h>

 #define SRC_FILE "/mnt/sdd/foo"
 #define DST_FILE "/mnt/sdd/bar"
 #define FILE_SIZE (16 * 1024)
 #define PATTERN_SRC 'X'
 #define PATTERN_DST 'Y'

struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args {
	__s64 src_fd;
	__u64 src_offset, src_length;
	__u64 dest_offset;
};

 #define BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC 0x94
 #define BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 13, \
				   struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args)

static pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
static int clone_done = 0;
static int reader_ready = 0;
static int stale_data = 0;

static void *reader_loop(void *arg)
{
	char buf[4096], want_buf[4096];

	memset(want_buf, PATTERN_SRC, 4096);
	pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
	reader_ready = 1;
	pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);

	while (1) {
		int done, fd, ret;

		fd = open(DST_FILE, O_RDONLY);
		assert(fd != -1);

		pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
		done = clone_done;
		pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);

		ret = read(fd, buf, 4096);
		assert(ret == 4096);
		close(fd);

		if (done) {
			ret = memcmp(buf, want_buf, 4096);
			if (ret == 0) {
				printf("Found new content\n");
			} else {
				printf("Found old content\n");
				pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
				stale_data = 1;
				pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
			}
			break;
		}
	}
	return NULL;
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	pthread_t reader;
	int ret, i, fd;
	struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args clone_args;
	int fd1, fd2;

	ret = remove(SRC_FILE);
	if (ret == -1 && errno != ENOENT) {
		fprintf(stderr, "Error deleting src file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
		return 1;
	}
	ret = remove(DST_FILE);
	if (ret == -1 && errno != ENOENT) {
		fprintf(stderr, "Error deleting dst file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
		return 1;
	}

	fd = open(SRC_FILE, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, S_IRWXU);
	assert(fd != -1);
	for (i = 0; i < FILE_SIZE; i++) {
		char c = PATTERN_SRC;
		ret = write(fd, &c, 1);
		assert(ret == 1);
	}
	close(fd);
	fd = open(DST_FILE, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, S_IRWXU);
	assert(fd != -1);
	for (i = 0; i < FILE_SIZE; i++) {
		char c = PATTERN_DST;
		ret = write(fd, &c, 1);
		assert(ret == 1);
	}
	close(fd);
        sync();

	ret = pthread_create(&reader, NULL, reader_loop, NULL);
	assert(ret == 0);
	while (1) {
		int r;
		pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
		r = reader_ready;
		pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
		if (r) break;
	}

	fd1 = open(SRC_FILE, O_RDONLY);
	if (fd1 < 0) {
		fprintf(stderr, "Error open src file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
		return 1;
	}
	fd2 = open(DST_FILE, O_RDWR);
	if (fd2 < 0) {
		fprintf(stderr, "Error open dst file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
		return 1;
	}
	clone_args.src_fd = fd1;
	clone_args.src_offset = 0;
	clone_args.src_length = 4096;
	clone_args.dest_offset = 0;
	ret = ioctl(fd2, BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE, &clone_args);
	assert(ret == 0);
	close(fd1);
	close(fd2);

	pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
	clone_done = 1;
	pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
	ret = pthread_join(reader, NULL);
	assert(ret == 0);

	pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
	ret = stale_data ? 1 : 0;
	pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
	return ret;
}

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: set dead flag on the right root when destroying snapshot

We were setting the BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag on the root of the
parent of our target snapshot, instead of setting it in the target
snapshot's root.

This is easy to observe by running the following scenario:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    btrfs subvolume create /mnt/first_subvol
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1

    btrfs subvolume delete /mnt/first_subvol
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

    btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data

The send command failed because the send ioctl returned -EPERM.
A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: avoid visiting all extent items when cloning a range

When cloning a range of a file, we were visiting all the extent items in
the btree that belong to our source inode. We don't need to visit those
extent items that don't overlap the range we are cloning, as doing so only
makes us waste time and do unnecessary btree navigations (btrfs_next_leaf)
for inodes that have a large number of file extent items in the btree.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: ioctl, don't re-lock extent range when not necessary

In ioctl.c:lock_extent_range(), after locking our target range, the
ordered extent that btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent() returns us
may not overlap our target range at all. In this case we would just
unlock our target range, wait for any new ordered extents that overlap
the range to complete, lock again the range and repeat all these steps
until we don't get any ordered extent and the delalloc flag isn't set
in the io tree for our target range.

Therefore just stop if we get an ordered extent that doesn't overlap
our target range and the dealalloc flag isn't set for the range in
the inode's io tree.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: update commit root on snapshot creation after orphan cleanup

On snapshot creation (either writable or read-only), we do orphan cleanup
against the root of the snapshot. If the cleanup did remove any orphans,
then the current root node will be different from the commit root node
until the next transaction commit happens.

A send operation always uses the commit root of a snapshot - this means
it will see the orphans if it starts computing the send stream before the
next transaction commit happens (triggered by a timer or sync() for .e.g),
which is when the commit root gets assigned a reference to current root,
where the orphans are not visible anymore. The consequence of send seeing
the orphans is explained below.

For example:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    mount -o commit=999 /dev/sdd /mnt

    # open a file with O_TMPFILE and leave it open
    # write some data to the file
    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1

    btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/send.data

The send operation will fail with the following error:

    ERROR: send ioctl failed with -116: Stale file handle

What happens here is that our snapshot has an orphan inode still visible
through the commit root, that corresponds to the tmpfile. However send
will attempt to call inode.c:btrfs_iget(), with the goal of reading the
file's data, which will return -ESTALE because it will use the current
root (and not the commit root) of the snapshot.

Of course, there are other cases where we can get orphans, but this
example using a tmpfile makes it much easier to reproduce the issue.

Therefore on snapshot creation, after calling btrfs_orphan_cleanup, if
the commit root is different from the current root, just commit the
transaction associated with the snapshot's root (if it exists), so that
a send will not see any orphans that don't exist anymore. This also
guarantees a send will always see the same content regardless of whether
a transaction commit happened already before the send was requested and
after the orphan cleanup (meaning the commit root and current roots are
the same) or it hasn't happened yet (commit and current roots are
different).

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole.

btrfs_punch_hole() will truncate unaligned pages or punch hole on a
already existed hole.
This will cause unneeded zero page or holes splitting the original huge
hole.

This patch will skip already existed holes before any page truncating or
hole punching.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: fix transaction leak during fsync call

If btrfs_log_dentry_safe() returns an error, we set ret to 1 and
fall through with the goal of committing the transaction. However,
in the case where the inode doesn't need a full sync, we would call
btrfs_wait_ordered_range() against the target range for our inode,
and if it returned an error, we would return without commiting or
ending the transaction.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
btrfs: replace EINVAL with ERANGE for resize when ULLONG_MAX

To be accurate about the error case,
if the new size is beyond ULLONG_MAX, return ERANGE instead of EINVAL.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
btrfs: free delayed node outside of root->inode_lock

On heavy workloads, we're seeing soft lockup warnings on
root->inode_lock in __btrfs_release_delayed_node. The low hanging fruit
is to reduce the size of the critical section.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: fix clone to deal with holes when NO_HOLES feature is enabled

If the NO_HOLES feature is enabled holes don't have file extent items in
the btree that represent them anymore. This made the clone operation
ignore the gaps that exist between consecutive file extent items and
therefore not create the holes at the destination. When not using the
NO_HOLES feature, the holes were created at the destination.

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: ensure btrfs_prev_leaf doesn't miss 1 item

We might have had an item with the previous key in the tree right
before we released our path. And after we released our path, that
item might have been pushed to the first slot (0) of the leaf we
were holding due to a tree balance. Alternatively, an item with the
previous key can exist as the only element of a leaf (big fat item).
Therefore account for these 2 cases, so that our callers (like
btrfs_previous_item) don't miss an existing item with a key matching
the previous key we computed above.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: fix leaf corruption after __btrfs_drop_extents

Several reports about leaf corruption has been floating on the list, one of them
points to __btrfs_drop_extents(), and we find that the leaf becomes corrupted
after __btrfs_drop_extents(), it's really a rare case but it does exist.

The problem turns out to be btrfs_next_leaf() called in __btrfs_drop_extents().

So in btrfs_next_leaf(), we release the current path to re-search the last key of
the leaf for locating next leaf, and we've taken it into account that there might
be balance operations between leafs during this 'unlock and re-lock' dance, so
we check the path again and advance it if there are now more items available.
But things are a bit different if that last key happens to be removed and balance
gets a bigger key as the last one, and btrfs_search_slot will return it with
ret > 0, IOW, nothing change in this leaf except the new last key, then we think
we're okay because there is no more item balanced in, fine, we thinks we can
go to the next leaf.

However, we should return that bigger key, otherwise we deserve leaf corruption,
for example, in endio, skipping that key means that __btrfs_drop_extents() thinks
it has dropped all extent matched the required range and finish_ordered_io can
safely insert a new extent, but it actually doesn't and ends up a leaf
corruption.

One may be asking that why our locking on extent io tree doesn't work as
expected, ie. it should avoid this kind of race situation.  But in
__btrfs_drop_extents(), we don't always find extents which are included within
our locking range, IOW, extents can start before our searching start, in this
case locking on extent io tree doesn't protect us from the race.

This takes the special case into account.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
trivial: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c: fix typo s/substract/subtract/

Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
btrfs: replace EINVAL with EOPNOTSUPP for dev_replace raid56

To return EOPNOTSUPP is more user friendly than to return EINVAL,
and then user-space tool will show that the dev_replace operation
for raid56 is not currently supported rather than showing that
there is an invalid argument.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: make sure we retry if we couldn't get the page

In inode.c:btrfs_page_exists_in_range(), if we can't get the page
we need to retry. However we weren't retrying because we weren't
setting page to NULL, which makes the while loop exit immediately
and will make us call page_cache_release after exiting the loop
which is incorrect because our page get didn't succeed. This could
also make us return true when we shouldn't.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: make sure we retry if page is a retriable exception

In inode.c:btrfs_page_exists_in_range(), if the page we get from the
radix tree is an exception which should make us retry, set page to
NULL in order to really retry, because otherwise we don't get another
loop iteration executed (page != NULL makes the while loop exit).
This also was making us call page_cache_release after exiting the loop,
which isn't correct because page doesn't point to a valid page, and
possibly return true from the function when we shouldn't.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: don't release invalid page in btrfs_page_exists_in_range()

In inode.c:btrfs_page_exists_in_range(), if the page we got from
the radix tree is an exception entry, which can't be retried, we
exit the loop with a non-NULL page and then call page_cache_release
against it, which is not ok since it's not a valid page. This could
also make us return true when we shouldn't.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs: don't check nodes for extent items

The backref code was looking at nodes as well as leaves when we tried to
populate extent item entries.  This is not good, and although we go away with it
for the most part because we'd skip where disk_bytenr != random_memory,
sometimes random_memory would match and suddenly boom.  This fixes that problem.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>