Mcgarry edits - Intro

This is partly the reason behind the somewhat simple Issues I 
introduced. Often I realize that a simple fix is in order, but I don't 
yet have the knowledge to do so precisely without changing the meaning 
of the content.


On 11/06/2014 01:28 PM, Katy Huff wrote:
>
> In fundamentals/intro.tex:
>
> >
> >  \Cyclus separates the problem of modeling a
> > -physics-dependent supply chain into a simulation kernel and archetypes that
> > -interact with the kernel during a simulation. The kernel is responsible for the
> > -deployment and interaction logic of entities in the simulation. Physics
> > -calculations are constrained to individual archetypes. Accordingly, specialists
> > +physics-dependent supply chain into two distinct components: a simulation kernel and archetypes that
> > +interact with the kernel. The kernel is responsible for the
> > +deployment and interaction logic of entities in the simulation. The archetypes represent
> > +individual types of facilities and capture their unique physics.  Accordingly, specialists
>
> Not all archetypes are facilities. I think you're right to want to 
> change this sentence a little. Maybe something like "Physics 
> calculations and customized behaviors take place within the 
> archetypes." Something like that?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub 
> <https://github.com/cyclus/fundamentals-paper/pull/60/files#r19967983>.
>