Just a personal opinion, but I think `&ch as &uint` looks a lot better than `&(ch as uint)` since this first makes me think that you are taking a reference to a `char` and casting the reference as a `&uint` instead of the way you have it written where it looks like you are casting the `char` to a `uint` and then taking a reference to that. Not that they are actually different, its just how I parse them. 

In short, I'd love it to say `&ch as &uint` instead :smile: