Paper: Frequentism and Bayesianism: A Python-driven Primer (Jake VanderPlas)

This is the final version – ready to be reviewed.
Just to expand on this a bit... originally I was working with "photon counts" rather than "flux". A statistician friend of mine became very concerned that I was glossing-over the leap from discrete photon counts to continuous flux, which in practice is trivially justifiable, but in the mind of a theoretical statistician is full of subtlety and nuance. To address this comment, I removed all references to photon counts! But I suppose I could put them back in, if that omission causes confusion...