grading hw5

3.7 (comment on pull request to bump up to 4.2)
Hi Chris and Radmer,
In general, your project is good. However, you should aim to scope your project more effectively. I believe you could have accomplished more in the time allotted. I think two directions you could have taken this is doing a more complicated analysis on each text file (rather than just one call to an external library) or doing some more complicated study of the results you find across a greater spread of documents. I also would have liked to see you clean up your filenames (vs. Test.txt and Functions.txt when there is just one function).
Otherwise, looks good. Nice documentation, and your code is very readable.