SPARK-2657 Use more compact data structures than ArrayBuffer in groupBy & cogroup

JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2657

Our current code uses ArrayBuffers for each group of values in groupBy, as well as for the key's elements in CoGroupedRDD. ArrayBuffers have a lot of overhead if there are few values in them, which is likely to happen in cases such as join. In particular, they have a pointer to an Object[] of size 16 by default, which is 24 bytes for the array header + 128 for the pointers in there, plus at least 32 for the ArrayBuffer data structure. This patch replaces the per-group buffers with a CompactBuffer class that can store up to 2 elements more efficiently (in fields of itself) and acts like an ArrayBuffer beyond that. For a key's elements in CoGroupedRDD, we use an Array of CompactBuffers instead of an ArrayBuffer of ArrayBuffers.

There are some changes throughout the code to deal with CoGroupedRDD returning Array instead. We can also decide not to do that but CoGroupedRDD is a `DeveloperAPI` so I think it's okay to change it here.

Author: Matei Zaharia <matei@databricks.com>

Closes #1555 from mateiz/compact-groupby and squashes the following commits:

845a356 [Matei Zaharia] Lower initial size of CompactBuffer's vector to 8
07621a7 [Matei Zaharia] Review comments
0c1cd12 [Matei Zaharia] Don't use varargs in CompactBuffer.apply
bdc8a39 [Matei Zaharia] Small tweak to +=, and typos
f61f040 [Matei Zaharia] Fix line lengths
59da88b0 [Matei Zaharia] Fix line lengths
197cde8 [Matei Zaharia] Make CompactBuffer extend Seq to make its toSeq more efficient
775110f [Matei Zaharia] Change CoGroupedRDD to give (K, Array[Iterable[_]]) to avoid wrappers
9b4c6e8 [Matei Zaharia] Use CompactBuffer in CoGroupedRDD
ed577ab [Matei Zaharia] Use CompactBuffer in groupByKey
10f0de1 [Matei Zaharia] A CompactBuffer that's more memory-efficient than ArrayBuffer for small buffers