Actually apply manual data to results from the scraper. 

In a previous pull request, we created a directory with all the manual data. Now, this adds in code to patch in that manual data after the scraper has run. 

I've written unit tests, and ran the scraper portion to make sure the manual information updates correctly. Unfortunately running the other layers is taking so long currently, I haven't been able to do that. 

That said, I think this works. If it can get merged - maybe someone else can help test. 
With the strategy of separate "automated" and "manual" files, is there a reason to limit the fields that can be manually altered?