Ipns name resolution

This branch is not yet complete, but before i move forward, the name resolution code (in namesys) needs some critiquing. There are also a decent number of bugfixes in this branch that i ran into while trying to get the code to a point where i could test ipns.
(If no flag soecified uses configure default)—
Sent from Mailbox

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Juan Batiz-Benet <juan@benet.ai> wrote:

> It makes sense if there's two processes. Also it currently can't.—
> Sent from Mailbox
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Jeromy Johnson <notifications@github.com>
> wrote:
>>> @@ -29,6 +30,10 @@ var cmdIpfsMount = &commander.Command{
>>>  	Flag: *flag.NewFlagSet("ipfs-mount", flag.ExitOnError),
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +func init() {
>>> +	cmdIpfsMount.Flag.String("n", "", "specify a mountpoint for ipns")
>> mounting ipns without ipfs being mounted feels weird... i dont know how i feel about that.
>> ---
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
>> https://github.com/jbenet/go-ipfs/pull/45/files#r18361132