sched/fair: Optimize cgroup pick_next_task_fair()

Since commit 2f36825b1 ("sched: Next buddy hint on sleep and preempt
path") it is likely we pick a new task from the same cgroup, doing a put
and then set on all intermediate entities is a waste of time, so try to
avoid this.

Measured using:

  mount nodev /cgroup -t cgroup -o cpu
  cd /cgroup
  mkdir a; cd a
  mkdir b; cd b
  mkdir c; cd c
  echo $$ > tasks
  perf stat --repeat 10 -- taskset 1 perf bench sched pipe

PRE :      4.542422684 seconds time elapsed   ( +-  0.33% )
POST:      4.389409991 seconds time elapsed   ( +-  0.32% )

Which shows a significant improvement of ~3.5%

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1328936700.2476.17.camel@laptop
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Reioux <reioux@gmail.com>

Backported for Linux 3.4 kernel

Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>

Conflicts:
	kernel/sched/fair.c

Change-Id: I7d4090f62c4c1dec3f6ae92118d1cd238733efa4
Signed-off-by: franciscofranco <franciscofranco.1990@gmail.com>
sched: reinitialize rq->next_balance when a CPU is hot-added

Reinitialize rq->next_balance when a CPU is hot-added.  Otherwise,
scheduler domain rebalancing may be skipped if rq->next_balance was
set to a future time when the CPU was last active, and the
newly-re-added CPU is in idle_balance().  As a result, the
newly-re-added CPU will remain idle with no tasks scheduled until the
softlockup watchdog runs - potentially 4 seconds later.  This can
waste energy and reduce performance.

This behavior can be observed in some SoC kernels, which use CPU
hotplug to dynamically remove and add CPUs in response to load.  In
one case that triggered this behavior,

0. the system started with all cores enabled, running multi-threaded
   CPU-bound code;

1. the system entered some single-threaded code;

2. a CPU went idle and was hot-removed;

3. the system started executing a multi-threaded CPU-bound task;

4. the CPU from event 2 was re-added, to respond to the load.

The time interval between events 2 and 4 was approximately 300
milliseconds.

Of course, ideally CPU hotplug would not be used in this manner,
but this patch does appear to fix a real bug.

Nvidia folks: this patch is submitted as at least a partial fix for
bug 1243368 ("[sched] Load-balancing not happening correctly after
cores brought online")

Change-Id: Iabac21e110402bb581b7db40c42babc951d378d0
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/208927
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
Reviewed-by: Peter Zu <pzu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Tested-by: Peter Zu <pzu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Huan Hsu <yhsu@nvidia.com>
sched: remove redundant update_runtime notifier

migration_call() will do all the things that update_runtime() does.
So it seems update_runtime() is a redundant notifier, remove it.

Furthermore, there is potential risk that the current code will catch
BUG_ON at line 687 of rt.c when do cpu hotplug while there are realtime
threads running because of enable runtime twice.

Change-Id: I0fdad8d5a1cebb845d3f308b205dbd6517c3e4de
Cc: bitbucket@online.de
Signed-off-by: Neil Zhang <zhangwm@marvell.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/215596
(cherry picked from commit 8f646de983f24361814d9a6ca679845fb2265807)
Reviewed-on: http://git-master/r/223067
Reviewed-by: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Automatic_Commit_Validation_User
GVS: Gerrit_Virtual_Submit
Reviewed-by: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com>