That's just how I'm accustomed to representing private variables/functions. —
Sent from my phone

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:06 AM, John West <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

>> +var assert = require('assert');
>> +util.require('cau.framework.Producer');
>> +
>> +util.provide('dab.data.producers.Espy');
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * Configure the producer.
>> + */
>> +dab.data.producers.Espy = function(req, dataStore) {
>> +  dab.data.producers.Espy.base(this, 'constructor', req, dataStore);
>> +  this.data_ = this.dataStore_.getEspyData();
>> +
>> +  // The field to group the data by.
>> +  this.segment_ = req.query.segment;
> I'm not familiar with the [name]_ pattern. I believe that you have a good reason for it, though. What is it?
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/jswest/damnatio/pull/1/files#r12509241