cpufreq: Avoid using smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

Even though this work item runs on only one cpu at a time (due to
queue_work_on()) it is possible for the work item to be preempted
and so use of smp_processor_id() is illegal.

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code: kworker/3:1/4162 caller is dbs_refresh_callback+0xc/0x188
[<c00151b0>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x120) from [<c0279058>]
(debug_smp_processor_id+0xbc/0xf0)
[<c0279058>] (debug_smp_processor_id+0xbc/0xf0) from [<c0454b54>]
(dbs_refresh_callback+0xc/0x188)
[<c0454b54>] (dbs_refresh_callback+0xc/0x188) from [<c0087290>]
(process_one_work+0x354/0x648)
[<c0087290>] (process_one_work+0x354/0x648) from [<c0089754>]
(worker_thread+0x1a8/0x2a8)
[<c0089754>] (worker_thread+0x1a8/0x2a8) from [<c008e480>]
(kthread+0x90/0xa0)
[<c008e480>] (kthread+0x90/0xa0) from [<c000f438>]
(kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

The intent of the code is to determine which CPU this work item
is running on, which we can easily do by passing that information
in a wrapper struct around the work struct. Do this so we avoid
this problem.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
adapted for Intellidemand from CAF reference

Change-Id: I26f0f2034bb2e7e2830b94d0a9ce5a07aeacdb80
Signed-off-by: faux123 <reioux@gmail.com>