sched/deadline: Don't replenish from a !SCHED_DEADLINE entity

In the deboost path, right after the dl_boosted flag has been
reset, we can currently end up replenishing using -deadline
parameters of a !SCHED_DEADLINE entity. This of course causes
a bug, as those parameters are empty.

In the case depicted above it is safe to simply bail out, as
the deboosted task is going to be back to its original scheduling
class anyway.

Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: vincent@legout.info
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414142198-18552-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched/dl: Simplify pick_dl_task()

1) Nobody calls pick_dl_task() with negative cpu, it's old RT leftover.

2) If p->nr_cpus_allowed is 1, than the affinity has just been changed
  in set_cpus_allowed_ptr(); we'll pick it just earlier than migration
  thread.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1410529340.3569.27.camel@tkhai
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched/deadline: Clear dl_entity params when setscheduling to different class

When a task is using SCHED_DEADLINE and the user setschedules it to a
different class its sched_dl_entity static parameters are not cleaned
up. This causes a bug if the user sets it back to SCHED_DEADLINE with
the same parameters again.  The problem resides in the check we
perform at the very beginning of dl_overflow():

	if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
		return 0;

This condition is met in the case depicted above, so the function
returns and dl_b->total_bw is not updated (the p->dl.dl_bw is not
added to it). After this, admission control is broken.

This patch fixes the thing, properly clearing static parameters for a
task that ceases to use SCHED_DEADLINE.

Reported-by: Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Reported-by: Vincent Legout <vincent@legout.info>
Tested-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Tested-by: Vincent Legout <vincent@legout.info>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1411118561-26323-2-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched/deadline: Fix inter- exclusive cpusets migrations

Users can perform clustered scheduling using the cpuset facility.
After an exclusive cpuset is created, task migrations happen only
between CPUs belonging to the same cpuset. Inter- cpuset migrations
can only happen when the user requires so, moving a task between
different cpusets. This behaviour is broken in SCHED_DEADLINE, as
currently spurious inter- cpuset migration may happen without user
intervention.

This patch fix the problem (and shuffles the code a bit to improve
clarity).

Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: raistlin@linux.it
Cc: michael@amarulasolutions.com
Cc: fchecconi@gmail.com
Cc: daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de
Cc: vincent@legout.info
Cc: luca.abeni@unitn.it
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1411118561-26323-4-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched/rt: Fix 'struct sched_dl_entity' and dl_task_time() comments, to match the current upstream code

Signed-off-by: xiaofeng.yan <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399605687-18094-1-git-send-email-xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched/deadline: Fix races between rt_mutex_setprio() and dl_task_timer()

dl_task_timer() is racy against several paths. Daniel noticed that
the replenishment timer may experience a race condition against an
enqueue_dl_entity() called from rt_mutex_setprio(). With his own
words:

 rt_mutex_setprio() resets p->dl.dl_throttled. So the pattern is:
 start_dl_timer() throttled = 1, rt_mutex_setprio() throlled = 0,
 sched_switch() -> enqueue_task(), dl_task_timer-> enqueue_task()
 throttled is 0

=> BUG_ON(on_dl_rq(dl_se)) fires as the scheduling entity is already
enqueued on the -deadline runqueue.

As we do for the other races, we just bail out in the replenishment
timer code.

Reported-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: vincent@legout.info
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1414142198-18552-5-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
sched/dl: Fix preemption checks

1) switched_to_dl() check is wrong. We reschedule only
   if rq->curr is deadline task, and we do not reschedule
   if it's a lower priority task. But we must always
   preempt a task of other classes.

2) dl_task_timer():
   Policy does not change in case of priority inheritance.
   rt_mutex_setprio() changes prio, while policy remains old.

So we lose some balancing logic in dl_task_timer() and
switched_to_dl() when we check policy instead of priority. Boosted
task may be rq->curr.

(I didn't change switched_from_dl() because no check is necessary
there at all).

I've looked at this place(switched_to_dl) several times and even fixed
this function, but found just now...  I suppose some performance tests
may work better after this.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1413909356.19914.128.camel@tkhai
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
OOM, PM: OOM killed task shouldn't escape PM suspend

PM freezer relies on having all tasks frozen by the time devices are
getting frozen so that no task will touch them while they are getting
frozen. But OOM killer is allowed to kill an already frozen task in
order to handle OOM situtation. In order to protect from late wake ups
OOM killer is disabled after all tasks are frozen. This, however, still
keeps a window open when a killed task didn't manage to die by the time
freeze_processes finishes.

Reduce the race window by checking all tasks after OOM killer has been
disabled. This is still not race free completely unfortunately because
oom_killer_disable cannot stop an already ongoing OOM killer so a task
might still wake up from the fridge and get killed without
freeze_processes noticing. Full synchronization of OOM and freezer is,
however, too heavy weight for this highly unlikely case.

Introduce and check oom_kills counter which gets incremented early when
the allocator enters __alloc_pages_may_oom path and only check all the
tasks if the counter changes during the freezing attempt. The counter
is updated so early to reduce the race window since allocator checked
oom_killer_disabled which is set by PM-freezing code. A false positive
will push the PM-freezer into a slow path but that is not a big deal.

Changes since v1
- push the re-check loop out of freeze_processes into
  check_frozen_processes and invert the condition to make the code more
  readable as per Rafael

Fixes: f660daac474c6f (oom: thaw threads if oom killed thread is frozen before deferring)
Cc: 3.2+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>