Restructure this document to line up with workflow.
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into docfix4
Update with line wrapping log reading.
Update push with get branch name.
Note about pull request msg, better pull request
Describe  git push to feature branch after pullreq
Local update of STATUS.devel, removing futures recently retired by me.
Fix config_param.future: Internal error in getVisibilityScope().

This test failed because a type definition inside a param "if" block is not actually in
the AST.  But an attempt is made to resolve the type constructor anyway in
resolveAutoCopies().

The cure is to weed out this undesirable case.

The .good file had to be updated ("false" is expected).

The .future file was removed, as the test now passes.
Remove assertion (syncs behave like records, but aren't).
Merge branch 'master' into fixConfigParamFuture

# Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary,
# especially if it merges an updated upstream into a topic branch.
#
# Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts
# the commit.
Suggested fixes from Thomas, rewrap some paragraph
Revert "Local update of STATUS.devel, removing futures recently retired by me."

This reverts commit 903e008148a9ac9948ee51a20a2a6228a9e34041.
Create a temporary directory for use during testing
Updating scripts to use CHPL_TEST_TMP_DIR
Merge pull request #220 from mppf/docfix4

Update GitCheatSheet to align with workflow

This commit restructures GitCheatSheet.txt to align with the workflow we're all
supposed to be following.. In particular, the commands you're likely to want to
run are different when working with a feature branch, so this way of organizing
it reflects that.

This is mostly just reordering the instructions in the file to align with the
workflow at the top, but includes some small improvements.

Reviewed by @thomasvandoren
Add a future assigning to the index variable in a loop with non-var iterator

The index variable should be const in these cases, so there should be a
compile time error message.
Future test users/hilde/refcnt now passes due to #168.

The .good file had to be updated due to changes in the number of formal temps created.
Following that change, this test passes, so the .future file was removed.
Merge pull request #238 from daviditen/newFutures

Add a future assigning to the index variable in a loop with non-var iterator

The index variable should be const in these cases, so there should be a compile time error message when trying to assign to it.
Future test classes/claridge/baseConstructorCall now passes due to #168.

The .good file needed to be updated due to a missing finial newline.  After that, the test
passes, due to PR #168 which implemented user-defined default constructor calls.
Update STATUS.devel, removing futures cured by #168 and #196.