Paper: Frequentism and Bayesianism: A Python-driven Primer (Jake VanderPlas)

This is the final version – ready to be reviewed.
Perhaps it would make sense to move this as part of the paragraph, rather than as a footnote?  In the discussion of marginalization/the billiards game, the "there are more correct frequentist approaches, but Bayesian approaches are easier" was the basic idea, and that applies here as well, so I don't think it would take much away from the paper.  But as a footnote it makes it look like you're hiding the fact that this was a contrived example by sticking the better approach in a footnote.  I don't think that's actually the intent, but it could be taken that way, so folding this into the narrative would address that.