cpufreq: interactive: Remove unnecessary cpu_online() check

Cpufreq no longer calls governor callback for offlined cpus. i.e. All
policy->cpus are guaranteed to be online. Hence we don't need explicit check to
see if cpu is online or not.

Change-Id: I9ad85ea4addd5b4a40952e59ed730dd15e328690
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
msm_fb: display: Reapply LUT calibration when re-enabling MDP

CONFIG_UPDATE_LCDC_LUT values were reset when MDP was shut down.
Reapply them when coming back up to preserve the calibration

Change-Id: I60327b03d401e4ddf86cb6efdb9990a5e5c41075
msm: msm_fb: wait for VSYNC instead of DMA_P for commit completion.

In the current implementation, we are waiting for DMA_P interrupt
in commit call to signal completion. This can cause 2 commits happening
in the same vsync period due to which IOMMU page faults can happen when
vsync comes while second commit is programming resgisters. To avoid this,
wait for DMA_P is replaced by wait for VSYNC.

Change-Id: I68d4d4b4e7a574f86faecd5b4812e1f5852f4209
Signed-off-by: Vishnuvardhan Prodduturi <vproddut@codeaurora.org>
msm: msm_fb: Replace wait for DMA_P with VSYNC in Pan_display Path.

This is a follow up change on gerrit 442946. Wait for DMA_P has to be
replaced with VSYNC even in Pan Display Path.

Change-Id: I8d600022cfa63f54d5b72ea5f64fc55315079b3a
Signed-off-by: Vishnuvardhan Prodduturi <vproddut@codeaurora.org>
msm: kgsl: Activate the dispatcher following a resume

The dispatcher is put into pause during suspend to avoid commands coming in
during suspend.  Unfortunately the dispatcher never has a chance to unpause
itself on resume so new commands sit there waiting for the GPU to turn on.

Change-Id: Ic0dedbad6c9744b47fa1ae711d1b04735fa2f083
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
sched: Fix clear NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK

I have faced a sequence where the Idle Load Balance was sometime not
triggered for a while on my platform, in the following scenario:

 CPU 0 and CPU 1 are running tasks and CPU 2 is idle

 CPU 1 kicks the Idle Load Balance
 CPU 1 selects CPU 2 as the new Idle Load Balancer
 CPU 2 sets NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK for CPU 2
 CPU 2 sends a reschedule IPI to CPU 2

 While CPU 3 wakes up, CPU 0 or CPU 1 migrates a waking up task A on CPU 2

 CPU 2 finally wakes up, runs task A and discards the Idle Load Balance
       task A quickly goes back to sleep (before a tick occurs on CPU 2)
 CPU 2 goes back to idle with NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK set

Whenever CPU 2 will be selected as the ILB, no reschedule IPI will be sent
because NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK is already set and no Idle Load Balance will be
performed.

We must wait for the sched softirq to be raised on CPU 2 thanks to another
part the kernel to come back to clear NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK.

The proposed solution clears NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK in schedule_ipi if
we can't raise the sched_softirq for the Idle Load Balance.

Change since V1:

- move the clear of NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK in got_nohz_idle_kick if the ILB
  can't run on this CPU (as suggested by Peter)

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1370419991-13870-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Git-commit: 873b4c65b519fd769940eb281f77848227d4e5c1
Git-repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
[smuckle@codeaurora.org: minor merge resolution for 3.4 in scheduler_ipi()]
Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@codeaurora.org>
Change-Id: I3548612057cccc2ecc29429c129c44183083831f