Revert "gpu: OC to 600mhz"

This reverts commit 2151f0cfb0a4a09f8ab033be705b8c56ce4a49b1.
revert: gpu: OC to 600mhz / add simple gov from Faux123
Revert "msm: cpufreq: Remove cross-calling limitation"

This reverts commit be01a17afb6b6e85456217caa1ac11eb0b6674e1.

Re-introduce cross calling in cpufreq to prevent race conditions in the
hardware when changing PLLs.

A core could be in retention, while another core, could try and set the
frequency of the core in retention, causing a change in PLL and when the
core exits retention, the PLL mismatch could hang the SPM state machine.

Change-Id: I99b454a0f146652f2d8a369f79f6d35748160dcb
Signed-off-by: Praveen Chidambaram <pchidamb@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: Configure WQ for higer priority

When the workqueue runs at a lower priority, it gets starved by higher
priority threads. Bump the WQ priority to high to ensure cpufreq work
queue gets a fair scheduling chance

Change-Id: I9e994da94a347dceb884e72ec3dd3da468a4471d
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Sivasubramanian <msivasub@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: Ensure cpufreq change happens on corresponding CPU

Checking the cpus_allowed mask of the current thread before changing the
frequency doesn't guarantee that the rest of the execution will continue on
the same CPU. The only way to guarantee this is to schedule a work on the
specific CPU and also prevent hotplug  of that CPU (already done by
existing code).

Change-Id: I51a02fcc777a47d3c16f2d83c47e96f2c59f7ae6
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
msm: cpufreq: Relax constraints on "msm-cpufreq" workqueue

This workqueue is not used in memory reclaim paths, so the
WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag is not needed. Additionally, there is no
need to restrict the queue to having one in-flight work item.
Remove these constraints.

Change-Id: I9edde40917d3ec885ce061133de20680634321d0
Signed-off-by: Matt Wagantall <mattw@codeaurora.org>
cpufreq: Save user policy min/max instead of policy min/max during hotplug

When a CPU is hotplugged off, various fields of the policy are saved so
that they can be restored when the CPU is hotplugged back in.

The existing code saves the policy min/max field during hotplug remove and
restores it into user policy min/max during hotplug add. This results in
the loss of the user policy min/max values across a hotplug remove/add.

Fix it by saving the user policy min/max instead of policy min/max during
hotplug remove. During a hotplug add, after user policy min/max is
restored, the policy min/max is already recomputed. So, there's no risk of
going beyound any limits imposed by the CPUFREQ_ADJUST/INCOMPATIBLE
notifiers.

Change-Id: Ib8e09fa324c1f80f095c5754b5dcf2685e8e4a66
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>