i understand and i read it i will put my response in that discussion to avoid confusion in the future if need be. I only posted here to try and offer suggestions to the repo that is already started rather than direct attention somewhere else.

To clarify...

1. I do not assume anything, CSS 3.0 should be used where possible, CSS 1.0 has not been used as the only version of css in a browser since IE 6! <- The dominant browser during prosilver's origins

2. Pre tagging classes with anchors is not part of any spec I have seen for CSS 1.0? Its a scope/specificity hack that was adopted by some at the time and has since been abandoned by the masses due to the amount of chars in a file served being more important than small advantages of specificity which due not even hold up in the newer versions of the language

3. naderman has stated many times that he is completely fine with not giving IE6 the same love as the newer browsers.

4. I am not commenting on any specific piece of code I just added the comment to this line as an example for my first comment. To show that the original naming convention and specificity was still being used for an enhancement.

With all that hopefully clearing up my points and discussions I will concede to your last statement however As I read the post it was not clear that you are only testing the font-size