So, what's your suggestion? Delete protocols/2.0 and just leave protocols/3.0 directory with JSPs there?
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:38 AM, LELEU Jérôme <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

>> @@ -25,11 +25,18 @@ cas1ServiceSuccessView.(class)=org.jasig.cas.web.view.Cas10ResponseView
>>  cas1ServiceSuccessView.successResponse=true
>>  
>>  ### CAS 2.0 Response Protocol Views
>> +cas2ServiceSuccessView.(class)=org.springframework.web.servlet.view.JstlView
>> +cas2ServiceSuccessView.url=/WEB-INF/view/jsp/protocol/2.0/casServiceValidationSuccess.jsp
>> +
>> +cas2ServiceFailureView.(class)=org.springframework.web.servlet.view.JstlView
>> +cas2ServiceFailureView.url=/WEB-INF/view/jsp/protocol/2.0/casServiceValidationFailure.jsp
> Actually, the version 1 will be still available through the /validate url, which is not the case of the 2.0, replaced by the 3.0 on /serviceValidate and /proxyValidate urls.
> That's why I would prefer cleaning than keeping for backward compatibility.
> Views defined in the protocol/ directory are also used when you enable the appropriate protocol : OpenID, OAuth, ClearPass, aren't they ?
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/224/files#r3710965