@adlawson Good catch! @mtdowling I feel like we would complicate usability by pushing the parameter to the end of the constructor (fieldname, name, contenttype, name)? I don't think we should complicate this for sake of BC. In documentation, it'll make more sense to the user if you have (field name, local name, remote name, contenttype). I would vote pushing to 3.8.x, however, do we have a timeline of that release?