Well since nobody is checking for it it is typically more work adding the
annotations than simply ignoring it all together
On 25 Mar 2013 13:26, "François Thillen" <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In bridge/BridgeTests/TestDefaultEcxeptionHandler.cs:
>
> > +using System;
> > +using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
> > +using Org.Openengsb.Loom.CSharp.Bridge.Interface;
> > +using OOSourceCodeDomain;
> > +using BridgeTests.TestConnectorImplementation;
> > +using Org.Openengsb.Loom.CSharp.Bridge.Implementation;
> > +using Org.Openengsb.Loom.CSharp.Bridge.Implementation.Common;
> > +using OpenEngSBCore;
> > +using System.Collections.Generic;
> > +using System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis;
> > +using Org.Openengsb.Loom.CSharp.Bridge.Interface.ExceptionHandling;
> > +using Org.Openengsb.Loom.CSharp.Bridge.Implementation.Exceptions;
> > +namespace BridgeTests
> > +{
> > +    [TestClass]
> > +    [ExcludeFromCodeCoverageAttribute()]
>
> Yes. Why shell I include the test coverage of the tests itself?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/openengsb/loom-csharp/pull/48/files#r3510631>
> .
>