Show PHP SAPI in WDT
Fixed broken setter in Form/Util/PropertyPath
merged branch jankramer/property-path-setter-fix (PR #6696)

This PR was merged into the master branch.

Commits
-------

69535cf Fixed broken setter in Form/Util/PropertyPath

Discussion
----------

[Form] Fixed broken setter in Form/Util/PropertyPath

Bug fix: [yes]
Feature addition: [no]
Backwards compatibility break: [no]
Symfony2 tests pass: [yes
Fixes the following tickets:
Todo:
License of the code: MIT
Documentation PR:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by bschussek at 2013-01-11T06:54:15Z

+1
merged branch lmcd/php-sapi (PR #6636)

This PR was merged into the master branch.

Commits
-------

16b3426 Show PHP SAPI in WDT

Discussion
----------

[WDT] Show PHP SAPI in WDT

PHP running under Apache as a module:
![sapi-apache](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/363540/53093/7709dc8a-5a48-11e2-8c09-031e0645e3ea.png)

PHP running with the in-built CLI web server (via `server:run`)
![sapi-cli](https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/363540/53094/96df9a0e-5a48-11e2-96e9-7bc2f452083d.png)
Remove special handling of empty arrays, fixes #5506
merged branch Seldaek/jsonresp (PR #6635)

This PR was submitted for the 2.1 branch but it was merged into the master branch instead (closes #6635).

Commits
-------

26aafff [HttpFoundation] Remove special handling of empty arrays, fixes #5506

Discussion
----------

[HttpFoundation] Remove special handling of empty arrays, fixes #5506

Bug fix: yes
Feature addition: no
Backwards compatibility break: tiny/no
Symfony2 tests pass: yes
Fixes the following tickets: #5506
License of the code: MIT

See the linked issue for details, IMO it should be removed because it's not consistently applied and just a WTF for people.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2013-01-09T11:11:06Z

:+1:, could you please update the changelog with the BC break ?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by Seldaek at 2013-01-09T11:16:44Z

If we really consider this as a BC break and document it as such then I guess it should be 2.2 only and not 2.1. @fabpot?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by vicb at 2013-01-09T11:28:16Z

IMO there is no such things as "tiny BC" but BCs are yes/no.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

by fabpot at 2013-01-09T15:09:18Z

Let's do it in master only and add a note in the CHANGELOG about the BC break.
[HttpFoundation] added missing info in CHANGELOG