I think this looks cleaner:

https://github.com/sethvargo-cookbooks/swap/blob/master/Gemfile

But I dont have a strong opinion.  your call.


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Douglas Thrift
<notifications@github.com>wrote:

> In Gemfile:
>
> >  gem 'kitchen-vagrant', :group => :integration
> > -gem 'foodcritic', :github => 'douglaswth/foodcritic', :branch => 'cygwin_needs_rake_dependency'
> > +gem 'foodcritic', :github => 'douglaswth/foodcritic', :branch => 'cygwin_needs_rake_dependency_v2.2.0'
>
> No, the only reason foodcritic is explicitly listed rather than just
> being pulled in by thor-foodcritic above is because of the rakedependency issue on Cygwin. Also, I think we should keep the
> Gemfile as close to what Berkshelf has given us as possible.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/rightscale-cookbooks/marker/pull/1/files#r5904334>
> .
>



-- 
Cary Penniman
Sr. Software Developer
www.RightScale.com <http://www.rightscale.com/>

Phone: (805) 243-0222
Email: cary@rightscale.com
Skype: carypenniman