SI-7841 Remove commented out AnyRef specialization from Function{0,1}.

In a sign of decreased optimism about that facility.
SI-7841 Remove AnyRef specialization from AbstractPartialFunction

This was missed in cc3badae1

Compatibility classes for formerly specialized variants used
by Scalacheck have been added as a stopgap measure until we
publish the next milestone.
SI-7841 More robust unspecialization of names

Names like `T1$sp`, which can arise from `AnyRef` specialization,
were leading to negative length Names if they ever passed through
`unspecializedName` or `splitSpecializedName`. This code path was
touched when printing the tree of a certain AnyRef specialized
classes after specialization, such as `AbstractPartialFunction`
(which had such specialization until a few commits ago.)

This commit handles that case correctly, and generally hardens
against unexpected names, which could pop up from third party
classes.

The documentation for `splitSpecializedName` transposed the
class and method specializations. The things you discover
when you turn examples in documentation in to test cases!

In addition, we now require non-negative length and offset in
`newTermName`
Merge pull request #2950 from retronym/ticket/7841

Damage control related to AnyRef specialization