Marking two MCJIT PIC tests as XFAIL on Darwin

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188734 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Second attempt to mark Large/PIC MCJIT test as XFAIL for PowerPC64

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188735 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixing XPASSes among MCJIT PIC test on i686

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188736 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[Sparc] Use HWEncoding instead of unused Num field in Sparc register definitions. Also, correct the definitions of RETL and RET instructions.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188738 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Marking MCJIT PIC tests as XFAIL on AArch64

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188740 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[PowerPC] More refactoring prior to real PPC emitPrologue/Epilogue changes.

(Patch committed on behalf of Mark Minich, whose log entry follows.)

This is a continuation of the refactorings performed in svn rev 188573
(see that rev's comments for more detail).

This is my stage 2 refactoring: I combined the emitPrologue() &
emitEpilogue() PPC32 & PPC64 code into a single flow, simplifying a
lot of the code since in essence the PPC32 & PPC64 code generation
logic is the same, only the instruction forms are different (in most
cases). This simplification is necessary because my functional changes
(yet to come) add significant complexity, and without the
simplification of my stage 2 refactoring, the overall complexity of
both emitPrologue() & emitEpilogue() would have become almost
intractable for most mortal programmers (like me).

This submission was intended to be a pure refactoring (no functional
changes whatsoever). However, in the process of combining the PPC32 &
PPC64 flows, I spotted a difference that I believe is a bug (see svn
rev 186478 line 863, or svn rev 188573 line 888): This line appears to
be restoring the BP with the original FP content, not the original BP
content. When I merged the 32-bit and 64-bit code, I used the
corresponding code from the 64-bit flow, which I believe uses the
correct offset (BPOffset) for this operation.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188741 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add an error check for a typo I accidentally made in a td file that caused an assert to fire.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188742 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Move AVX and non-AVX replication inside a couple multiclasses to avoid repeating each instruction for both individually.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188743 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add AVX-512 and related features to the CPUID detection code.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188745 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fix formatting. No functional change.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188746 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Teach selectiondag how to handle the stackprotectorcheck intrinsic.

Previously, generation of stack protectors was done exclusively in the
pre-SelectionDAG Codegen LLVM IR Pass "Stack Protector". This necessitated
splitting basic blocks at the IR level to create the success/failure basic
blocks in the tail of the basic block in question. As a result of this,
calls that would have qualified for the sibling call optimization were no
longer eligible for optimization since said calls were no longer right in
the "tail position" (i.e. the immediate predecessor of a ReturnInst
instruction).

Then it was noticed that since the sibling call optimization causes the
callee to reuse the caller's stack, if we could delay the generation of
the stack protector check until later in CodeGen after the sibling call
decision was made, we get both the tail call optimization and the stack
protector check!

A few goals in solving this problem were:

  1. Preserve the architecture independence of stack protector generation.

  2. Preserve the normal IR level stack protector check for platforms like
     OpenBSD for which we support platform specific stack protector
     generation.

The main problem that guided the present solution is that one can not
solve this problem in an architecture independent manner at the IR level
only. This is because:

  1. The decision on whether or not to perform a sibling call on certain
     platforms (for instance i386) requires lower level information
     related to available registers that can not be known at the IR level.

  2. Even if the previous point were not true, the decision on whether to
     perform a tail call is done in LowerCallTo in SelectionDAG which
     occurs after the Stack Protector Pass. As a result, one would need to
     put the relevant callinst into the stack protector check success
     basic block (where the return inst is placed) and then move it back
     later at SelectionDAG/MI time before the stack protector check if the
     tail call optimization failed. The MI level option was nixed
     immediately since it would require platform specific pattern
     matching. The SelectionDAG level option was nixed because
     SelectionDAG only processes one IR level basic block at a time
     implying one could not create a DAG Combine to move the callinst.

To get around this problem a few things were realized:

  1. While one can not handle multiple IR level basic blocks at the
     SelectionDAG Level, one can generate multiple machine basic blocks
     for one IR level basic block. This is how we handle bit tests and
     switches.

  2. At the MI level, tail calls are represented via a special return
     MIInst called "tcreturn". Thus if we know the basic block in which we
     wish to insert the stack protector check, we get the correct behavior
     by always inserting the stack protector check right before the return
     statement. This is a "magical transformation" since no matter where
     the stack protector check intrinsic is, we always insert the stack
     protector check code at the end of the BB.

Given the aforementioned constraints, the following solution was devised:

  1. On platforms that do not support SelectionDAG stack protector check
     generation, allow for the normal IR level stack protector check
     generation to continue.

  2. On platforms that do support SelectionDAG stack protector check
     generation:

    a. Use the IR level stack protector pass to decide if a stack
       protector is required/which BB we insert the stack protector check
       in by reusing the logic already therein. If we wish to generate a
       stack protector check in a basic block, we place a special IR
       intrinsic called llvm.stackprotectorcheck right before the BB's
       returninst or if there is a callinst that could potentially be
       sibling call optimized, before the call inst.

    b. Then when a BB with said intrinsic is processed, we codegen the BB
       normally via SelectBasicBlock. In said process, when we visit the
       stack protector check, we do not actually emit anything into the
       BB. Instead, we just initialize the stack protector descriptor
       class (which involves stashing information/creating the success
       mbbb and the failure mbb if we have not created one for this
       function yet) and export the guard variable that we are going to
       compare.

    c. After we finish selecting the basic block, in FinishBasicBlock if
       the StackProtectorDescriptor attached to the SelectionDAGBuilder is
       initialized, we first find a splice point in the parent basic block
       before the terminator and then splice the terminator of said basic
       block into the success basic block. Then we code-gen a new tail for
       the parent basic block consisting of the two loads, the comparison,
       and finally two branches to the success/failure basic blocks. We
       conclude by code-gening the failure basic block if we have not
       code-gened it already (all stack protector checks we generate in
       the same function, use the same failure basic block).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Remove unused variables that crept in.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188761 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[stackprotector] Refactor out the end of isInTailCallPosition into the function returnTypeIsEligibleForTailCall.

This allows me to use returnTypeIsEligibleForTailCall in the stack protector pass.

rdar://13935163

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188765 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[stackprotector] Added support for emitting the llvm intrinsic stack protector check.

rdar://13935163

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188766 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[mips][msa] Added and.v, bmnz.v, bmz.v, bsel.v, nor.v, or.v, xor.v


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188767 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[stackprotector] Removed stale TODO.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188768 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Removed trailing whitespace.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188769 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[stackprotector] Added significantly longer comment to FindPotentialTailCall to make clear its relationship to llvm::isInTailCallPosition.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188770 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[stackprotector] Small Bit of computation hoisting.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188771 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
[stackprotector] Small cleanup.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@188772 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8