Yes, that is better. Will update.

Henrik Lindberg
henrik.lindberg@cloudsmith.com



On Jun 4, 2013, at 19:41, Eric Sorenson wrote:

> In arm-8.hiera_2/index.md:
> 
> > +>
> > +> Alternative: A simple CSS mechanism where precedence is a score (sum of precedences) 
> > +> has the odd effect that say 'environment' + 'virtual' gets a higher precedence than 'node'. The scoring
> > +> must instead add a fraction to the highest precedence so that the score does not pass the ceiling. Thus combinations
> > +> increase the precedence like numbered paragraphs: 'environment' (2) and 'virtual' (3) is given the score '3.2' which is
> > +> lower than 'node' (4). The segments are ordered in descending precedence order.
> > +>
> > +
> > +It is also allowed to declare multiple categories with the same semantics as when a `when` clause is used in
> > +a `case` expression - e.g.:
> > +
> > +    when virtual true, node 'kermit.example.com' {
> > +      # bindings when virtual or when node is kermit
> > +    }
> > +
> > +This is an _or_ operator. (Internally, this results in two bindings with different precedence). This is of value
> could this actually use an or operator? the stanza above would make a lot more sense if it was
> when virtual true or node 'kermit.example.com { ..
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
>