Also, should it be context.contextActivities ?

fugu13 <notifications@github.com> wrote:

>In xAPI.md:
>
>> -		<td>When filtering on activities (object), include statements for which > -			any of the context activities match the specified object. > +	<tr><td>viewId</td><td>String</td><td> </td> > +	 <td>The id for a view of the data in this LRS that has been predefined in the LRS. The way > +	 such views are defined is outside the scope of this specification, but they MAY be defined to > +	 designate and possibly pre-build slices of the LRS data based on any deterministic rules the LRS > +	 provides. > + > +	 The LRS MUST reject the request with an HTTP 400 status if an unknown viewId is specified > +	 The LRS MUST filter the statement data in a consistant manner as defined in the specified view, if the viewId is recognized. > +	 </td> > +	</tr> > +	<tr><td>related_activities</td><td>Boolean</td><td>False</td> > +		<td>Apply the activity filter broadly. Include statements for which > +			any property is of type activity and has an id matching the specified activity id. > +			This includes but is not limited to: context.activities and activities 
>
>Again (though I suppose this is technically above my other comment in diff view, so look below), we should specify exactly the places this applies to.
>
>—
>Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.￼
>