i agree with this


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Mike White <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> In corehq/apps/commtrack/static/commtrack/ko/settings.js:
>
> > @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
>
> I'm a little unsure about this whole ko/ folder pattern.
>
> First of all, seems like it should at least be js/ko?
>
> I mean, clearly, js, css, ko, one of these things does not belong.
>
> Secondly, just because a file uses a certain framework doesn't mean you
> have to make a folder where you put all (and only) the files using that
> framework. Presumably there are or could be other javascript files included
> on the page that interact with the data used by the ko files.
>
> Long story short, is there any aspect in which
>
> ko/settings.js
>
> is better than
>
> js/ko.settings.js?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/dimagi/core-hq/pull/717/files#r3272669>
> .
>