Collapsed comment here:

> For me, this is the pièce de résistance of RAC/FRP. Can it be more emphasized that newcomers shouldn't get discouraged by it's initial abstractness. Can we add something that entices users to seek "enlightenment" of what this means.
>
> I don't remember which specific essay, but Paul Graham did a hell of a job selling Lisp and macros, he sold it so that the promise was greater than the barriers of entry. Do we need to sell signals a bit more?

@kastiglione If there are bits here that are too abstract, I'm more liable to want to rip them out entirely.

Many people who get into it through the concrete stuff will eventually learn more about the abstract, but few are going to be interested by the abstract discussion ahead of time. I don't think we'd be doing ourselves any favors if we really try to explain FRP here.

Let's instead focus on the benefits of RAC that people are most liable to attain after even just a little RACing.