> I must have fallen asleep at the reviewing wheel. You've got precision and recall the wrong way around, which means I didn't hand-check your tests. It should have been more obvious than to hand-check: for the label indicator matrix examples, recall is 1 for all but 'samples' where precision is < 1).

Can you elaborate on this?

> Also, perhaps make the label indicator matrix and sequence of sequence tests use equivalent data.

As far as I know, test are perform for both multilabel type.