Should cowboy_resource be a cowboy_sub_protocol?

I haven't run this code (don't have R16 here atm, so query atom causes issues) but I want to start a debate about the correct way to dispatch to custom handlers.

I thought the correct way was to do as this patch does:
```erlang
%% Dispatch
{dispatch, [{'_', [{"/", Handler, HandlerOpts}]}]}
%% Handler.erl
init(_Transport, Req, Opts) ->
    {upgrade, protocol, SubProtocol}.
%% SubProtocol.erl
upgrade(Req, Env, Handler, HandlerState) ->
    NestedSubProtocol:upgrade(Req, Env, SubProtocol, {state, Handler, HandlerState}).
```

But it seems, from looking around github, that no one does this.

(Updated for clarity).